term 01

Companionable Intelligence

ACTIVE — INTERNAL
The question
What does it take for an AI presence to earn a place in family life? Not to capture attention, but to hold trust — with boundaries a household actually controls.
Why it’s ours
We run intelligence at family scale, in our own home, before we say anything about it.
What we’re building
We are building presence designs for household AI: emotional-regulation-aware interaction patterns, explicit boundary systems, and the governance a family needs to stay in charge of what lives with them.
term 02

Neurodivergent-First Design

ACTIVE — INTERNAL
The question
Most software assumes a mind it was never tested on. What do interfaces look like when they are designed from AuDHD and neurodivergent cognition outward, rather than retrofitted with accommodations?
Why it’s ours
Lived AuDHD experience inside the house — this program’s primary data is not borrowed.
What we’re building
We are building interaction patterns and system designs that treat attention, sensory load, and executive function as first-class design inputs, not edge cases.
term 03

Learning as Experience

ACTIVE — FIELD
The question
AI can already generate curriculum. The open problem is the experience of learning: environments that adapt to the child — pace, modality, interest, regulation — not the child to them.
Why it’s ours
Family-scale deployments give us a live field site for how children actually meet adaptive systems.
What we’re building
We are building AI-shaped learning environments and the instrumentation to understand what a child’s experience of them really is.
term 04

Sensory & Ambient Wellbeing

FORMING
The question
Environments, media, and machines all tax the human nervous system. How can they be designed to lower its cost of living instead?
Why it’s ours
The sensory dimension of neurodivergent experience makes this cost visible to us where others average it away.
What we’re building
We are building ambient and media systems designed around nervous-system load — sound, light, pacing, and interruption as materials with a measurable human price.

Programs are long. We publish when there is something true to say.

If you are a researcher, an institution, or an aligned collaborator with a serious interest in any of these questions, we read correspondence carefully.

Correspondence